Change In 34-Hour Restart Rules Appears Likely

By:  Marc Bardack

Last week, the Senate passed a transportation funding bill providing for a change in hours of service rules for truck drivers.  The change proposed in the bill depends on the outcome of a currently pending safety fitness determination study being conducted by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.  In the Senate bill, there would either be a return to the now suspended 2013 34-hour restart rules or a return to the 2011 34-hour rules, but with a cap of 73 driving hours per 7 day period.

Meanwhile, in the House, the House Appropriations Committee has approved its 2017 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development funding bill ( which simply restores the 34-hour restart rules in effect on December 26, 2011.  The bill specifically does away with the requirement of two off-duty periods from 1:00 a.m. to 5:00 am and the prohibition on use of more than one restart during a consecutive 168-hour period – requirements from the 2013 rules which were subsequently suspended.

While much work and reconciling needs to be done before a bill can be sent to the President, it seems clear that changes and clarifications to the 34-hour restart rules are coming soon.  Carriers and their drivers should monitor this legislation to ensure timely compliance with federal regulations.


Seventh Circuit Declares Class Action Waivers Unenforceable, Creates Circuit Split

The Expanding Duty to Defend and its Landmines

SCOTUS Clarifies Standing Requirements in Long-Awaited Spokeo Opinion

Change In 34-Hour Restart Rules Appears Likely

Learn more about FMG

CGL and Business Liability

Commercial and Complex Litigation

Construction and Design Law

Financial Services and Securities

Insurance Coverage and Extra-Contractual Liability

Government Law

Labor and Employment Law

Professional Liability / Errors and Omissions

Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP
100 Galleria Parkway
Suite 1600
Atlanta, Georgia 30339-5948

Tel: 770.818.0000 / Fax: 770.937.9960

Copyright © 2016 Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP Click here to print the article.