If you are having trouble reading this email, you may view the online version.

September 2017


September 2017

"Section Spotlight"

California Employment Law Team   

  

 

FMG's California Employment Law Team is comprised of over 20 L&E attorneys representing employers throughout the Sunshine State.  With offices in Sacramento, San Francisco (Downtown and Marin County), Los Angeles (Downtown, Hermosa Beach and Orange County) and San Diego, our attorneys combine local knowledge and nationwide expertise to provide employers with practical and successful representation.
Read Article



Awards

Peter Catalanotti Receives Diversity Award 

 

Congratulations to Peter Catalanotti who was recognized for his efforts to increase awareness of diversity issues in the Bay Area Legal Community.  Mr. Catalanotti received the diversity award at the Barristers Club 9th Annual Diversity Reception.   

Read Article



Another Delay Is in the Works for the DOL Fiduciary Rule

By: Ze’eva R. Kushner

The landscape of the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule continues to shift and has changed significantly since our last commentary on this topic in June. (DOL Fiduciary Rule is Delayed No More) On June 9, 2017, two provisions of the Rule became applicable: (i) the expansion of the definition of who is a fiduciary, and (ii) the establishment of impartial conduct standards. The next step, full implementation, is currently set to take place on January 1, 2018. This date is no longer set in stone. In fact, it likely will be delayed until mid-2019.

Read Article



Data Privacy-As the Spokeo Turns

By: Jonathan M. Romvary

As we all know, the data privacy industry has been paying close attention to ongoing saga of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), including this firm’s blog, most recently here, here and here. That spotlight is shining a little brighter on the Ninth Circuit in connection with a ruling earlier this month.

Earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit issued its most recent Spokeodecision, holding, on remand, that the plaintiff, Thomas Robins, satisfied the harm requirement for Article III standing in his FCRA claim against Spokeo. Writing for the Court, Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain set forth a two-step inquiry to determine whether a plaintiff satisfies Article III standing:

(1) Was the statute at issue established to protect the plaintiff’s concrete rights?
(2) Did the specific procedural violations cause or present a material risk of actual harm to plaintiff’s concrete rights?

Read Article





Click below to
subscribe to FMG's blogs:

Business Litigation Blog

Construction & Surety Law Blog

Cyber, Privacy & Security Blog

Employment Law Blog (US)

Employment Law Blog - CA

Employment Law Blog - FL

Employment Law Blog - GA

Employment Law Blog - NC

Employment Law Blog - PA and NJ

Financial Services and Securities Litigation Blog

Government Law Blog

Government Relations Blog

HOA Blog

Immigration & I-9 Services Blog

Insurance Coverage and Extra-Contractual Liability Blog

Life Sciences Blog

Medical & Health Care Blog

Professional Liability & MPL Blog

Transportation Blog

Wage & Hour Blog


Learn more about FMG




About Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP

Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP is a leading national litigation firm, serving clients through its practice groups in CGL and Business Liability, Commercial and Complex Litigation, Construction and Design Law, Financial Services and Transactions, Government Law, Government Relations, Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith, Labor and Employment Law, and Professional Liability. With offices in Georgia, California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Florida, FMG attorneys serve as trusted counsel to corporations and governments throughout the country, providing practical, efficient, and cost-effective solutions for legal issues. For more information about FMG, visit www.fmglaw.com.




    www.fmglaw.com

Information conveyed in this presentation should not be construed as legal advice or represent any specific or binding policy or procedure of any organization. Information provided in this presentation is for educational purposes only. These materials are written in a general format and not intended to be advice applicable to any specific circumstance. Legal opinions may vary when based on subtle factual distinctions. All rights reserved. No part of this presentation may be reproduced, published or posted without the written permission of Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP.
All rights reserved. Copyright © 2016 Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP