Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP’s California partners Paul A. Bigley and Dhave K. Balatero successfully enforced a time-limited conditional policy limit settlement in phase one of a bifurcated trial based on the recent holding in…
Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP’s California partners Paul A. Bigley and Dhave K. Balatero successfully enforced a time-limited conditional policy limit settlement in phase one of a bifurcated trial based on the recent holding in CSAA Ins. Exch v. Hodroj (2022) 72 Cal. App. 5th 272, 276 (“Hodroj”). Hodroj holds that the determination of the parties’ intent to settle is determined as a matter of law from the pre-litigation communications of the parties. Pursuant to Hodroj, Mr. Bigley and Mr. Balatero secured a judgment in favor of defendants by successfully arguing that the only relevant question is: “Would a reasonable person looking at the parties’ communications think they intended to be bound by a settlement agreement? ” When the answer is “yes,” an inconsistency in a later writing does not constitute a rejection of the offer.”
Litigation of this case dates back to 2019 involving a heavy two vehicle accident with both vehicles being declared total losses. Plaintiff claimed to have suffered many injuries and underwent several surgeries with medical expenses exceeding $3M. Plaintiff’s counsel claimed a time limited conditional policy limit demand was blown resulting in an “open policy” in the wake of the carrier tendering its minimal $15,000 policy limit. Plaintiff’s counsel never demanded less than multiple millions of dollars, and brought in two additional heavyweight plaintiff’s firms to litigate the case against Mr. Bigley and Mr. Balatero.
The trial proceeded in a bifurcated format upon the Court’s granting of FMG’s motion to first try defendants’ “prior settlement” affirmative defense which proceeded as a pure legal issue before the trial judge only. The Court previously denied defendant’s two prior motions for summary judgment. On December 1, 2023, the Court issued the Phase One ruling in defendants’ favor and found that there was a binding and enforceable settlement agreement. Defendants timely filed a memorandum of costs as the prevailing party. Plaintiff neither appealed the Court’s ruling nor filed a motion to strike or tax costs.
Hodroj is an important case and represents an important opportunity to curb the widespread abuse and gamesmanship that persists in the conditional policy limit demand arena.
Full Recovery Awarded in Arbitration Involving Breach of Contract Dispute in Colorado
FMG attorneys Jennifer Brockel and Kate Johnson prevailed in an arbitration proceeding in Denver, Colorado, concerning an unpaid balance for expert witness work. The matter arose when the opposing party failed to pay amounts owed…
Defense Verdict in California Real Estate Dispute
After a three-week trial in San Diego County, FMG attorneys Christopher Weber and Lili Mikaelian obtained a defense verdict in a case involving an allegedly fraudulent real estate scheme. FMG’s clients, the escrow company and…
FMG Prevails on Objection in California Class Action Settlement
FMG attorneys Danielle Ocampo and Chris Weber successfully defended a local medical clinic against a lawsuit brought by a self-represented attorney. The plaintiff, a patient of the clinic, claimed the clinic violated California’s privacy laws…
Summary Judgment Obtained in Wisconsin Bench Trial
FMG Attorneys Jonathan Schwartz and Joshua Zhao obtained summary judgment for our insurer client in a declaratory judgment action arising out of a shooting at a bar. Our client contended that due to an assault…
Defense Verdict in Sexual Harassment Jury Trial in Massachusetts
FMG attorneys Jennifer Markowski, Alexandra Held, Jennawe Hughes, and Katherine Chenail obtained a defense verdict for our union benefit funds client after a two–week jury trial in Norfolk County Superior Court. The clients were sued…
Bench Trial Victory in Defense of Florida Golf Club
FMG attorneys Jessica Farrelly and Jessica Cauley prevailed at a bench trial on behalf of their client, a non-profit private golf and country club, in the defense of a complaint alleging claims for breach of…
Defense Verdict in Wrongful Death Jury Trial in Georgia
FMG attorneys Jimmy Scarbrough, Andy Treese, and Jake Daly obtained a defense verdict in a wrongful death trial involving a pedestrian who was struck and killed by a MARTA bus in 2019. MARTA and the…
Jury Trial Victory in Illinois Involving $99 Million Negligence Claim
FMG attorneys Kingshuk Roy and Dustin Karrison successfully defended an owner and property management company at trial. The plaintiff sought $99 million in damages from the jury for paraplegic injuries sustained as a result of…
Arbitration Victory in Employment Retaliation Case in Georgia
FMG attorneys Brad Adler, Michael Hill, and Kelli Spearman prevailed on all claims in a multi-day arbitration for a nationwide automotive-platform company. The plaintiff was a former sales manager who alleged the company terminated her…
FMG Secures Trial Win in Florida
FMG attorney Kingshuk Roy represented the plaintiffs in a case involving a construction company employee who struck their vehicle while attempting a U-turn. Plaintiff 1 claimed permanent injuries to her head, neck, right wrist, left…
FMG attorneys Brian Goldberg and Anna Perry secured a victory after a three-day jury trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The case involved claims for specific performance and…
FMG attorneys Rachel Hobbs and Mike Gelfound achieved a significant victory in a bench trial at the Superior Court of San Joaquin before Judge George J. Abdallah. The case involved a contribution action between insurers…