Technology

Full spectrum litigation

FMG's Technology practice team provides a range of legal services focused on the special needs of technology companies, whose business operations are often time-sensitive and touch upon many different areas of law.

Download PDF

FMG’s Technology practice team provides a range of legal services focused on the special needs of technology companies, whose business operations are often time-sensitive and touch upon many different areas of law.

Our clients run the gamut from large, established technology businesses, to emerging growth companies, to individual entrepreneurs and their financial institutions and investors.

We represent our clients in a range of emerging issues and disputes unique to technology companies. FMG will be your aggressive partner to counsel and defend you as you navigate through the perilous times when litigation or the threat of litigation raises the specter of lost opportunities that cannot be regained.

Our counseling and litigation experience includes:

  • 3D Printing
  • Blockchain and cryptocurrency
  • Data security, privacy and breach
  • Defamation, blogging and product disparagement
  • Errors and omissions
  • Employment and Incentives
  • Financial technology
  • Healthcare information technology
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet of Things (IoT)
  • Licensing
  • Life Sciences
  • Manufacturing agreements
  • Medical products and devices
  • Officers and directors
  • Payments
  • Professional liability
  • Research and development
  • Restrictive covenants and non solicitations
  • Sales and distribution
  • Social media
  • Technology litigation
  • Telecommunications
  • Trademark and copyrights
  • UAS/UAV/Drone
  • Wages and Overtime
  • Workplace policies

Successes

FMG attorneys Danielle Ocampo and Chris Weber successfully defended a local medical clinic against a lawsuit brought by a self-represented attorney. The plaintiff, a patient of the clinic, claimed the clinic violated California’s privacy laws by using pixel tracking technology on its website to collect personal information about the plaintiff from use of the website. The plaintiff was trying to file an individual claim after opting out of a class action settlement. The court agreed with FMG’s argument that the plaintiff didn’t provide enough specific facts to support a wiretapping claim and dismissed the case.  

Michael S. Geller v. Riverside Medical Clinic; Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Riverside – Moreno Valley; Case No. CVMV2404340  

Professionals

Click to see our team

Related News & Blogs

    • Rated by

      Super Lawyers Business Law

    • Recognized by

      Best Lawyers

    • Benchmark Litigation

      Star Litigator