Is An Employee’s Intentional Act An Employer’s “Accident”?
7/10/18
By: Rebecca Smith and Zach Moura
It may just be, according to the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc. (June 4, 2018, No. S236765). In Liberty v. Ledesma, …
Pay-When-Paid Clauses: A Cautionary Tale
3/28/18
By: Jake Carroll
With the recent surge of construction projects in Georgia, the memories of owner and developer bankruptcies following the 2008 financial crisis may have grown dim. Nevertheless, material suppliers and subcontractors must remember that when the pace slows …
Cumis Counsel Limited: Insurer-Appointed Counsel Requires Actual Conflict of Interest
2/9/18
By: David G. Molinari
The California Third District Court of Appeals has ruled that the right to Cumis counsel, independent counsel paid by the insurer (San Diego Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Soc’y, 162 Cal. App. 3d 358 (1984))…
3/28/13
By: Bart Gary
Many contracts, especially construction contracts, will contain a provision whereby one party, usually a subcontractor, agrees to add the other party to the contract, usually the general contractor, as an additional insured on the former’s insurance coverage. …