What employers should expect when the government reopens: Key considerations for the days ahead
11/14/25
By: Sunshine Fellows
After more than 40 days of disruption, the longest U.S. government shutdown in history is nearing its end. Triggered by a lapse in appropriations on October 1, 2025, the shutdown has deeply impacted federal agencies, contractors and …
With great innovation comes great responsibility: AI, digital workforces, and emerging employment risks
11/11/25
By: Sunshine Fellows
Imagine hiring a new manager who never sleeps, never takes a vacation and never complains. Sounds perfect, right? But what if that manager is an algorithm? In today’s workplace, that’s not science fiction. It’s reality. AI systems …
The $100,000.00 question: The USCIS’s clarification on the Presidential Proclamation, restriction on entry of certain non-immigrant workers
11/11/25
By: Christopher M. Lewis
In late September of 2025, the Trump administration issued the “Presidential Proclamation on Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers” (hereinafter the “Proclamation”). Pursuant to the Proclamation, “the entry into the United States of aliens as …
Third Circuit rules that an employer’s passwords are not “trade secrets”
11/10/25
By: Shane Miller
Key takeaway
An employer’s passwords may protect valuable information, but the passwords themselves lack independent economic value and thus fail to qualify as “trade secrets” under the Defend Trade Secrets Act.
Understanding trade secrets
Trade secret misappropriation …
NLRB compensatory damage awards stand at crossroads after Fifth Circuit finds statutory authority lacking for such awards
11/7/25
By: Robert G. Chadwick, Jr.
On October 31, 2025, Judge Edith Jones wrote for the Fifth Circuit in Hiran Management, Inc. v. NLRB: “Ninety years after Congress created the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) the NLRB claimed for the …
Eighth Circuit holding on LMRA preemption of state law employment discrimination claims: It substantially depends
11/5/25
By: Nicholas S. Franos
In King v. UPS, decided on September 25, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a plaintiff’s race and age discrimination claims, as well as …
Ninth Circuit defines the “costs” associated with offers of judgment or settlement
11/5/25
By: Nicholas S. Franos
In Alvarado v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 30, 2025, the court clarified the scope of awards under California Code of Civil Procedure Section …
Retention bonus does not constitute wages under the Massachusetts Wage Act
10/28/25
By: Jennifer L. Markowski and Emily Mayfield
On October 22, 2025, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (“SJC”) ruled that an employee’s agreed-to retention bonus did not constitute “wages” under the Wage Act, M.G.L. ch. 149, § 148. The Wage …
Pay Transparency Act becomes even more transparent
10/28/25
By: Gaia T. Linehan
The 2023 Pay Transparency Act (the “Act”) has recently been refined by Governor Newsom to provide additional protections and clarity for employees.
Previously, the Act required employers to provide a pay scale for a position, but …
Third Circuit clarifies FLSA settlements: Employers can include FLSA releases in opt-out class actions
10/27/25
By: Sunshine Fellows
In a closely watched decision at the intersection of wage-and-hour law and class procedure, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has resolved a question that had long divided district courts: can a Rule 23 …
Eastern District of Pennsylvania clarifies limits of workplace harassment and retaliation claims
9/11/25
By: Nick Franos
In Nyamu v. Merck & Co., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted summary judgment to the employer, dismissing claims of retaliation and hostile work environment sexual harassment. The decision illustrates both the …
Third Circuit reverses class certification in insurance underpayment suit
9/3/25
By: Sean R. Riley
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s decision to certify two classes against an insurance carrier, holding that individualized issues predominated over common ones. See Drummond …