Appeals
Court Rules Dealership Not Liable in Motorcycle Crash Case
Christopher Lynch and Edward Storck obtained summary judgment in a case involving suit by plaintiff against the client dealership and the tortfeasor who was loaned a motor vehicle by the client dealership while the tortfeasor’s…
Christopher Lynch and Edward Storck obtained summary judgment in a case involving suit by plaintiff against the client dealership and the tortfeasor who was loaned a motor vehicle by the client dealership while the tortfeasor’s vehicle was in for repairs. Tortfeasor struck plaintiff while he was riding his motorcycle causing significant injuries with damages well in excess of the policy for the tortfeasor. Plaintiff brought suit against the dealership pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-154a which created vicarious liability for motor vehicle lessors. In the underlying suit, we successfully obtained Summary Judgment on behalf of the dealership pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-60, which grants immunity for dealers who loan motor vehicles/dealer plates to customers while the customer’s vehicle is being prepared and the dealership obtains proof of insurance from the customer. In the Appeal, Plaintiff argued that the trial court got it wrong by concluding that there was no question of fact that the transaction was a loan and not a rental. The Appellant argued that the agreement that the Dealership had the customer signed used the word rental approximately 27 times throughout the document, the document itself was titled “Rental Agreement” and the agreement itself indicated that it was for consideration. The Plaintiff argued that a jury should have been allowed to decided what type of transaction was involved.
Kyle McCall v. Gina Sopneski et al. (AC 42498)
More Successes
More Successes
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Landmark ADA Emotional Distress Case
Wayne Melnick and Michael Hill prevailed before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in a case of first impression regarding whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act permits recovery for emotional-distress damages. The…
Illinois Appellate Court Upholds Pre-Accident Waiver
Michael Sanders, Brad Purcell and Sophie Stevanovich obtained a favorable decision from the Illinois Appellate Court affirming the use of exculpatory clauses. Plaintiff broke her ankle after falling while top rope climbing at an indoor facility. Plaintiff…
Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Sovereign Immunity Dismissal
Sun Choy and Wes Jackson obtained an appellate victory for the City of Roswell in a case involving an officer’s use of spike strips to stop a high-speed pursuit. The officer involved parked his car…
Ohio Appellate Court Upholds Summary Judgment Based on Known Danger
Doug Holthus and Cara Wright received an affirmed summary judgment in Ohio’s Third District Court of Appeals in favor of FMG’s client, a local school district board of education, in a slip and fall case.…
Florida Court of Appeals Reverses Lower Court and Enforces Engagement Agreement
Robert Klein and Chris Fraga prevailed in having Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal reverse a prior order incorrectly denying a motion to dismiss for improper venue based on their attorney client’s engagement agreement. Based…
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Affirms Decision Regarding Statute of Repose
FMG attorney Sean Riley prevailed on appeal before the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in a matter involving claims asserted against an architecture firm arising from the design and construction of the County’s jail. In 2021,…
Victory in Georgia Court of Appeals to Enforce Arbitration Clause Property Dispute
FMG attorneys Michael Freed and George Green prevailed in an appeal of a trial court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration. The case arose from a developer’s sale of two adjacent residential lots to…
Eleventh Circuit Appeal, Secures Qualified Immunity for Georgia Officers
FMG attorneys Michael Freed and Sun Choy obtained a victory in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of seven Athens-Clarke County police officers who were granted qualified immunity in a Fourth Amendment excessive…
Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Section 1983 Civil Rights Case
Cynthia O’Donnell and Shane Miller successfully obtained a judgment from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of a case alleging violations of Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights. The case involved FMG’s defense of…
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Sides with FMG Client in Section 1983 Win
FMG attorneys successfully represented Midland County, Texas in a decision that may be headed to the Supreme Court. In Wilson v. Midland County, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of…
Dismissal in Georgia Appeal Regarding Municipal Ante Litem Notice
Sun Choy and Jake Daly successfully handled a case in which the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a case against FMG’s client, the City of Albany, based on inadequate ante litem (pre-suit)…
Interlocutory Appeal of a Legal Malpractice Claim Denied in Massachusetts
Will Covino and Allison Eddy prevailed in obtaining the dismissal of a myriad of legal malpractice and conspiracy-based claims asserted against an attorney who purportedly facilitated an oral loan agreement designed to defraud judgment creditors.…