9/12/24
In Goyco v. Progressive Insurance Company, 257 N.J. 313 (2024), the New Jersey Supreme Court was called upon to decide whether the operator of a low-speed electric scooter (LSES) is entitled to personal injury protection (PIP) …
Category: Appellate Advocacy
Georgia Supreme Court clarifies sovereign immunity for injunctive relief in stormwater runoff cases
9/5/24
By: R. Cameron Kline and Kevin R. Stone
The Georgia Supreme Court recently took the opportunity to clarify the scope of sovereign immunity for Georgia counties in stormwater runoff cases when injunctive relief is sought. In Satcher, et al. v. …
Four recent cases highlight the importance of obtaining finality before appealing
8/22/24
By: Donald Patrick Eckler and Joshua W. Zhao
The Illinois Appellate Court recently ruled on a series of cases considering whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal on a purportedly final judgment without a finding under Illinois …
CA Supreme Court clarifies analysis of unconscionable terms in employment arbitration agreements
8/8/24
By Mandy D. Hexom and Daniel Parker Jett
In Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc., Case No. S273802, (https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S273802.PDF), the California Supreme Court addressed the following question: Under what circumstances should a trial court sever substantively unconscionable terms and …
Time-limitation provisions in residential lease agreements in Georgia
8/7/24
By: Jacob E. Daly
In 2019, the Georgia Supreme Court was asked to determine the validity of a provision in a residential lease agreement that limited the time during which the tenant of an apartment complex could sue the owner …
7/25/24
By: P. Betty Su
On June 5, 2024, in Lockner v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon, 333 Or. Ct. App. 27 (2024), Case No. A178057, the Court of Appeals of Oregon decided that a landlord’s “all-risk” property policy did …
7/8/24
By: Donald Patrick Eckler and Shari S. Shelmadine
Patrick Eckler and Shari Shelmadine, of FMG’s Chicago office, prevailed on a matter of first impression in the Court of Appeals of Indiana, arguing that an exclusion in their client’s …
The private right of action in privacy laws: Comparing Vermont to California
6/25/24
By: Justin J. Boron, Matt P. Delfino, and Danielle A. Ocampo
In recent years, a number of states have passed privacy laws, including Montana, Maryland, Tennessee, Kentucky, and many others. The Vermont legislature followed suit with the Vermont …
30 days means 30 days is the lesson from Illinois Appellate Court
6/20/24
By: Donald Patrick Eckler, Michael D. Sanders, and Joshua W. Zhao
In Rocha v. Munson Ski & Inboard Water Sports, Inc. et al., 2024 IL App (1st) 231469, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, held that following …
FMG argues in favor of the Fifth Circuit retaining its precedent in Section 1983 Lawsuits
5/21/24
By: Philip W. Savrin, P. Michael Freed, and William H. Buechner, Jr.
FMG Attorneys Phil Savrin, Michael Freed and Bill Buechner are representing Midland County, Texas in an en banc case in which the entire Fifth Circuit …
Walking a constitutional tightrope: Free speech and family matters – Malone v. Rose
5/20/24
A recent Tennessee appellate opinion, Malone v. Rose,1 sheds light on the delicate issue of prior restraints on speech in family law cases. Though the matter unfolded in a family law dispute, it serves more …
4/25/24
By: Sean C. Harrison and Lorne G. Hiller
In March 2024, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled in Gregory v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Runkel v. Owners Insurance Company, 2024 WL 1040531, that, as a matter of first impression, …