Five things California lawyers have to report to the State Bar
4/5/22
By: Gregory T. Fayard California lawyers have certain reporting obligations to the State Bar. These obligations are mandatory. The reporting must occur within 30 days of the event. Failing to report can lead to discipline, jeopardizing the lawyer’s law license. Here are five things California lawyers must report to the Bar (which they may not…
Another Step Toward Limiting Forced Arbitration: House Passes the FAIR Act
3/22/22
By: Margot Parker Following President Biden’s recent signing of a bill ending mandatory arbitration of sexual assault and harassment claims accruing on or after March 2, 2022, the U.S. House approved the FAIR Act (Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal) on March 17, 2022 – a bill seeking to broadly prohibit companies from enforcing arbitration agreements with…
California implements new 2022 COVID-19 supplemental Paid Sick Leave Law
3/2/22
By: Mandy D. Hexom On February 9, 2022, California’s Governor signed Senate Bill 114 into law requiring employers with 26 or more employees (and some public entities) to provide up to 80 hours of supplemental paid sick leave for certain COVID-19 related reasons. This new law, known as California’s 2022 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave…
A Quick Summary of the Ethics Rules on Discrimination for California Lawyers
4/20/21
By: Greg Fayard For decades, the California State Bar had an anti-discrimination ethics rule applicable to lawyers. That rule prevented lawyers from unlawfully discriminating in hiring, promoting, firing, or accepting or not accepting cases based on certain protected characteristics—the big ones that people thought about in the early 1990s: race, sex, religion, sexual orientation, national…
SCOTUS Grants Injunctive Relief In Free Exercise Case Challenging California’s COVID-19 Restrictions
4/14/21
By: Caitlin Tubbesing Building on its pandemic-era Free Exercise Clause decisions, SCOTUS rejected the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of California’s COVID restrictions on religious activities for the fifth time on Friday (4/9/21). In a 5-4 vote in Tandon, et al. v. Newsom, et al., the majority granted two California pastors’ application for emergency injunctive relief relating…
Are Non-Refundable Lawyer Retainers Legal in California?
1/26/21
By: Greg Fayard Joe wants to hire Bill, a California lawyer, to defend a breach of contract case. Bill agrees to defend Joe but will only take a $10,000 non-refundable retainer. Is this legal? No. Under Rule 1.5(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct that govern California lawyers, non-refundable retainers are now permitted in a very…
New COVID-19 Notice Requirements for California Employers
1/12/21
By: Chelsea Whelan The new year ushers in new rules for California employers receiving notice of potential COVID-19 exposure in the workplace. California Labor Code section 6409.6 became effective January 1 this year following the passage of Assembly Bill 685 and will sunset on January 1, 2023. Section 6409.6 requires employers provide written notice within one business…
Are Adult Entertainment Clubs Going To Save California’s Restaurants?
12/22/20
By: John Moot In what could be the beginning of a reopening for restaurants hard hit by California’s new stay at home orders, two San Diego adult entertainment clubs have come to the rescue. A San Diego Superior Court Judge on December 16th granted a preliminary injunction enjoining any governmental entity or law enforcement officer from enforcing…
California Assembly Bill 1552 – Near Miss or Cautionary Tale for Insurers?
11/11/20
By: Ryan Greenspan As fear of the novel coronavirus and COVID-19 continues to grip the world, an array of government rules, restrictions, and guidelines have been imposed. Some businesses have been operating at a limited capacity and some have closed outright. In March of this year, California’s governor issued one of the strictest orders in the…
Prop 51: CA Supreme Court Creates Noteworthy Exception to Reduction or Apportionment of Non-Economic Damages
11/10/20
By: Zachary Price Under Proposition 51, although all defendants in California are liable to a plaintiff for 100% of plaintiff’s economic damages (including such things as medical expenses and lost earnings), defendants are only liable for noneconomic damages (such as physical pain, mental suffering, and emotional distress) in proportion to their fault. In other words,…
California Lawyers Who Ignore Lienholders Do So At Their (Disciplinary) Peril
10/20/20
By: Greg Fayard In personal injury law, California lawyers regularly must deal with medical liens. For example, lienholders have certain rights to proceeds from a settled case and expect to be paid. In the past, if a California lawyer ignored or mishandled a medical lien on personal injury proceeds, the lienholder could pursue the attorney…
California’s New Normal: Electronic Service and Remote Depositions
9/25/20
By: Marshall Coyle Prior to California Governor Gavin Newsom approving Senate Bill 1146 on September 18, 2020, California law provided that, for cases filed on or after January 1, 2019, if a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or facsimile transmission, electronic service of the document was permitted if a party…